Larger documents from Green Hills Software, Inc.,, John Fund, Alexander, 13th Duke of Manchester, Dan O'Dowd, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Thomas Anderle, Jonathan Scott Franklin, Morgan Pillsbury Gell, Rayelan Smith, Craig Franklin, and their associates.
Jaye E. Gell married Morgan on Valentine's Day 2005 at the court house, I believe in Charlotte, North Carolina. Jay had begun attacking me verbally and libeling me after my son, Justin, and I visited them not long after they were married. I was entirely stunned by Jay's onslaught of ugly comments, which had no origin in the ongoing events. At the time I did not know he was working for the Bush-Cheney Cabal (BCCabal).
I believe he impregnated and married Morgan on orders to provide a way to contain her while also making her available to attack me in multiple ways.
RaptureTrue was a Yahoo Account I used for a while. This exchange took place
rapturetrue: Are you there?
Morgan : sort of
rapturetrue: What do you mean?
Morgan : many people here
rapturetrue: Ah, you are not alone.
Morgan : Here are some good jokes!
Morgan : Why are Michael Jackson's pants so small?
>Because they aren't his. >What did the man on the beach say to Michael
Jackson? >Get out of my sun! >Why did Michael Jackson place a phone call
to Boyz-2-Men? >He thought it was a delivery service. >What's the
difference between Michael Jackson and Casper? >One is pale and scares kids
and the other is a friendly ghost. >How do we know Michael is guilty?
>Several children have fingered him. >Why did Michael Jackson rush over
to Wal-Mart? >He heard that boys' pants were 1/2 off. >What's the
difference between a supermarket bag and Michael >Jackson? >One is white,
made of plastic, and should be kept away from >small children. The other is
used to hold groceries. >How do you know when it's bedtime at the Neverland
Ranch? >When the big hand touches the
Morgan : little hand. >What's somewhat brown and often
found in children's underpants? >Michael Jackson's hand. >What is blonde,
has six legs, and roams Michael Jackson's dreams >every night? >Hanson.
>What the difference between Michael Jackson and acne? >Acne doesn't come
on your face until you're about fifteen. >Why can you always win a race with
Michael Jackson? >Because he always likes to come in a little behind.
>What did Michael Jackson say to Gary Glitter? >I'll swap you a 10 for
two fives. >Janet and Michael Jackson were at home one night... >Janet:
Shall we get a pizza and video tonight? >Michael: Yeah, ok, can we get
Aladdin? >Janet: No Michael, just a pizza and video. >What's the
difference between Michael Jackson and greyhound >racing? >The greyhounds
wait for the hares to come out. >W
rapturetrue: Who is there?
Jokes to cover who you are talking to?
I was driving with my three young children one warm
summer evening when a woman in the convertible ahead
of us stood up and waved. She was stark naked! As I
Commentary will appear in italics. The following is the letter sent by Ms. Heriot
to a list of media writers. The program
allowed her to change the salutation to make it seem as if it was sent to only
the person named. We received this letter with different salutations from
several individuals who are covering the case.
I am a friend of John
1. See letter where Heriot talks about the quality time she
and John spend together in hotel rooms.
…. not his lawyer, but I think
it’s important to send you this letter. Sometime ago, you posted an
unflattering stories about him on your American Politics web site. I’ve
no reason to doubt that you considered it both accurate and newsworthy at the
time. I’m certainly not writing to quarrel with that judgment. If
the allegations against John were true, then they would have merited publication.
Indeed, they would have merited ridicule (and your web site clearly good at
it). But the evidence is overwhelming that those allegations are not
true. John maybe a less-than-perfect person, but he is not guilty of the
offenses of which he has been accused. John’s greatest sin was that he
became briefly romantically involved 1999)
2. See transcript of
tape from weaselsearch.com. A full copy of the tape is available upon your
request. The tape documents the relationship as ongoing in late 1999, having
started in October of 1998. The abortion
took place in March of 1999.
3. See copy of the
phone bill from my apartment in New
York where Morgan and John lived together when I was
away from the beginning of 2000 to early 2001. For trial other declarations and
testimony will be available from individuals aware they were there together. Calls by Fund are noted to his mother in Live
and Judge Diane Sykes in Wisconsin. Notice the times, unlikely he just dropped by
for a cup of sugar.
4. See e-mail from
Carol Divine Molin, a Republican woman who works with victims of domestic
violence, dated September
5. See work orders for utilities signed by my daughter from
John Fund’s address in the summer of 2001.
These exhibits document the character of the relationship
and its continuity refuting Ms. Heriot’s assertion, and Fund’s that it was of
short duration or just sexual. It was
marital in nature.
woman who had been diagnosed with Borderline Personality Disorder.
Note that no documentation is offered. This is a libel. Morgan has never been diagnosed with such a
disorder. Ms. Heriot is an attorney who knows better than to engage in simple
here say. Those who are not professionals should be cautious in expressing medical
… When he realized that Ms. Pillsbury was unstable, he broke
the relationship (in early to mid-1999). That started a firestorm that
has not yet subsided. John and many of his female friends and
acquaintances have been the victims of an apparently jealous rage ever since. I
would not blame you a bit for refusing to take my word for it.
No one who did not actively help John Fund in his ongoing
campaign of slander was ever mentioned or contacted. They were also victims. Those who were contacted
had involved themselves in helping John malign Morgan or me. Offered proof of this they continued their
behavior. One nearly got Morgan killed by inciting yet another beating,
evidently intentionally. An example is
Christine Reis-Hall, who offered to help do research to find discreditable
information on either of us. She sent her
nude picture to John who received it on Morgan’s computer, making it Morgan’s
property along with her salacious e-mails. Another example is Diane Sykes, a
Federal Judge in Wisconsin
who offered John legal aid. In fact,
John never broke off the relationship with Morgan, always returning to her and
apologizing for his indiscretions when Morgan learned of them. John was evidently unfaithful to Morgan with
dozens of women. These “relationships”
were of short duration, mostly taking place in hotel rooms when he was away on
business. The documents speak for
themselves. Their relationship continued without a break, as evidenced by the
accumulation of e-mails and their content. The chronology of these, which is
inches thick, is being produced for trial. ….Fortunately, Ms. Pillsbury left a trail of
documents (some of them under oath) that demonstrate his innocence quite
convincingly, including a notarized affidavit in which she admits that John did
not abuse her and that there had never been wedding plans between the two of
Morgan called me
right after she had escaped from John and told me he had battered her, forcing
her to sign the single mentioned document. The
document does not sound like Morgan; it sounds coerced. This is a man who stalked her down after she
fled and moved in with her, expecting her to continue traveling to Jersey City to clean his
apartment and buy his burritos. He complained bitterly that he could not get on
line without her on a home computer. It
was a marital relationship.
…..Many of these documents are available at
John’s special web site
6. Registered from Heriot’s address in San Diego.
….at www.johnfund.com. They convinced
even Eric Alterman, whose article Who Framed John Fund appears in this week’s
The Nation, hardly a nest of right-wing apologists. The articles web
address is www.thenation.com/doc.mhtml
7. See copy of rebuttal letter written by Mark Crispin Miller.
This link is no longer active because of the uproar Alterman’s untruths caused
at The Nation.
….Those two web sites are just the tip of the
iceberg. The full story Ms. Pillsbury’s strange crusade against John
would fill several file cabinets and include check forgery, credit card fraud,
witness harassment and endless suicide threats.
Morgan has full documentation of her financial dealings with
John. He was the thief. Money is control and John Fund had to have
complete control. He successfully defrauded
her of thousands of dollars while they were living together as husband and
wife. He showed her how to sign his name so she could write the household
checks. This practice began in July of 2001.
The credit card in question was not John’s but Morgan’s. John got her to get one issued in his name on
her credit and used it to take Gail out in San Diego. This is documented. He ran up her charges and
then refused to reimburse her. He told
the bank he was not responsible. He used
his reputation to destroy her credit. But it is demonstrable that Morgan was not
taking Gail to dinner in San Diego
in December of 2001. In court, John will
have to face that unsavory fact among others.
After he filed this claim with the bank he continued to live with her,
eat her food and insist she clean for him.
…Suffice it to say that almost nothing Ms.
Pillsbury says can be taken at face value. As Eric Alterman writes, her
name is not Morgan Pillsbury
Morgan has used the name Morgan Francis Pillsbury, not the
name she was given at birth, for at least 12 years. There is nothing covert
about that. She was adopted legally by my parents when she
was 12, making her legal last name Pillsbury.
She took the name Morgan because she was addicted to horses as a
teenager and especially liked the Morgan bred horses. The name Francis was adopted in honor of my
father, her grandfather.
Eric Alterman sent last Mother’s Day morning.
responses went to him within three hours.
The implication Morgan was less than honest was outrageous and addressed
by Mark Crispin Miller.
….and, while she claims
that she was 23 years old
called into question people’s misassessments of her age. She has always looked
younger than she is. What woman would do otherwise? It is a family joke.
….when she and John had their romantic relationship
in 1999, in fact she was born on July
5, 1967, making her almost 36 years old today. We may never
know for sure, but her claim that she was pregnant made shortly after their
1999 break-up is dubious at best.
10. See medical record.
Morgan stayed at the home of Matthew Earl Jones, who, with his girl
friend Pam, are close friends of hers.
John called and talked to Matthew soon after the procedure. Matthew is
willing to testify to these facts. Craig Franklin was taped saying that John
told him he was the father of Morgan’s aborted child. John admits it on the
weaselsearch tape. The ‘romantic relationship’ continued until he
battered her in 2002.
person with a reckless disregard for the truth would publish it. Indeed,
a lie about a pregnancy would have been easy compared to the lies Ms. Pillsbury
admits to under oath. A few months before her initial involvement with
John, she bilked her step father out of $10,000 by falsely telling him that she
had a heart condition that required a medical procedure to correct.
Morgan has a heart
condition; a family condition. Both her
aunts, Anne AEtheline Pillsbury Gripp, who owned the Santa Barbara Orchid
Estate until her death in 1994, and Carol Sylvia Pillsbury Holbert, a
businesswoman living in Camarillo who died in 1974, had heart conditions. Anne died at 59, Carol at 36. I have had two
heart attacks. My younger brother,
Stephen Martin Pillsbury, has had open heart surgery, and a niece was born with
a heart condition. All of these are
objectively ascertainable facts. My brother, Charles Arthur Pillsbury, works in
the Department of Finance in Sacramento
as a systems analyst for the Governor’s office.
Ask him if he has two dead sisters. Ask him about Stephen, myself and his
….Again, you need not
take my word for it; she herself described this incident in the deposition
transcript (in an unrelated case) on John’s web site.
No where in the deposition does Morgan say she did not have
a heart condition. However, that case is directly related because John Fund and
Craig Franklin have been cooperating. Craig was nearly $200,000 in arrears in
support until just days ago in hopes that this would shut down the civil trial
in New York. His motivation was revenge for Morgan’s
testimony on my behalf.
….I know of other spectacular examples of her
Having made this assertion I would like to see some
….When asked during her deposition “What lies
have you told in the past?”, she replied, Too many to name.
The deposition referred to was taken regarding fraud and
abuse perpetrated by Craig Franklin who is my ex-husband. This comment refers to a point in 2000 when
Morgan had taken a long hard look at her life and changed many things. She
wrote letters apologizing to several individuals to whom she had lied. She wanted to put herself on an honest footing
with them. I was the only person her
lies had harmed. Most of her lies were
silly. Some were solicited by John who told her that this was a practice he
The lies she admits to in the deposition are all about her
cooperation with Craig Franklin. She came out to testify against him, having
taped his admissions about having created fraudulent stock option agreements in
collusion with the president of his corporation in an attempt to deny me
marital assets potential worth millions of dollars. He also admitted to
battering me in the same deposition. Morgan had taped him making this admission to
redress the harm she had done me. The tape
Morgan made forced Craig to tell the truth on the deposition since he knew on
redirect he would other wise be caught in perjury. The $10.000.00 was given to
pay her for her efforts in slandering me. It was small potatoes with tens of
millions in question. His excuse for getting her to sign ‘loan papers’ was that
he was going to write it off on his taxes.
11. Deposition. Tape is
available if you want to hear it. The attorney who took the deposition was Todd
Porter, Esq., practicing in San Luis
…Moreover, Ms. Pillsbury has refused to produce
the proof one would ordinarily expect. John reports that after the alleged
abortion, she claimed that the procedure had been performed negligently and
that she would never been able to have a child. He offered to get her an attorney
to handle any medical malpractice claim if she would produce her medical
records. After much prodding, she never did.
12. Morgan was never asked
to produce such documents before. Here
are the medical records. Heriot’s other assertions were news to Morgan. John
never offered to help in any way.
circumstances, it’s time to take down the John Fund story from your web
site. Those who are familiar with the story from Alterman’s article will
know that it is false and your credibility will be hurt. But for those who
aren’t familiar with his article (and there are many), it is defamatory.
No one is asking for a retraction; just take the story down.
It’s time to go on to the next
conservative pundit. (I suggest William Bennett and his conservative
apologists.) This time, however, please double check your facts.
It’s not just your intended target that end up getting hurt. You'd be
surprised at the number of people who get hurt on both sides of the politcal (sic)
spectrum when false stories are spread. 13. Biographical sketch
of Dr. Arthur F. Pillsbury
form for Confidential Information for victim of domestic violence in Jersey City, New
for your attention.
Professor of Law
would think that a professor of law would have called the parties involved before
so exposing herself and the University to the possibility of a law suit. This is especially true because Morgan and
Gail were already acquainted when Morgan was living in California.
If it becomes
necessary I will start to look for a contingency attorney. For the reasons
previously stated I would prefer not to be forced to take that action. Law suits are time consuming and emotionally
debilitating. But these slanders and libel are so widely spread I would have no
Melinda's parents asked to adopt Carolyn, who had been living with them most of the year and spending summers with Melinda, then married to Ronald E. Foster. Melinda consented on the condition she would have custody if anything happened to them and they would be responsible for Carolyn's expenses. This, they failed to carry out. Melinda's mother, Mary Alice Reasoner Pillsbury died when Carolyn, who had begun calling her self Morgan, in 1987.
Morgan was then living with Melinda's sister, Anne Pillsbury Gripp, in Goleta, CA. Anne had been asked to take Morgan because she was attempting to seduce Anne's clients from the Orchid Nursery, according to what Anne told Melinda when she called to demand Melinda take her. Morgan was then 19 years old.
Shocked, Melinda did not believe Anne at the time. Later, she found out these were the simple truths and only part of the ugly truth about Morgan.